- About
- Admissions
- Study at AUS
- Prospective Students
- Bachelor's Degrees
- Master's Degrees
- Doctoral Degrees
- Admission Publications
- International Students
- Contact Admissions
- Grants and Scholarships
- Sponsorship Liaison Services
- Testing Center
- New Student Guide
- File Completion
- New Student Orientation
- Payment Guide
- Executive Education
- Students with Disabilities
- Academics
- Life at AUS
- Research and Graduate Studies
- Contact Us
- Apply Now
- .
Overview
International Conference on Writing for STEM
The global dimensions of STEM research have led to the emergence of several related areas of research that aim to enhance STEM education. These areas include text analysis, academic literacy, teaching, learning, innovation and creativity. The teaching and learning of writing (and reading) represent significant aspects of STEM education and research, since writing is the medium used by STEM researchers and students to communicate their original findings.
The conference welcomes contributions that draw on the insights of both reading and writing specialists, and STEM educators and researchers about reading and writing. The conference addresses issues related to writing pedagogies, writing contexts and academic writing in STEM publications. It will provide a platform for presentations and how-to workshops on areas of writing such as writing for scholarly publications in English; collaborative interdisciplinary authorship; writing research reports; developing research arguments; audience engagement; critical thinking and writing; teaching reading and writing to STEM students; and analyzing written text. We also propose a new collaborative work-in-progress workshop format on our call-for-papers page.
- Abstract Submission Deadline: October 31, 2019
- Registration Deadline: November 14, 2019
- Full Paper Submission Deadline (TBA)
The conference welcomes contributions that draw on the insights of both reading and writing specialists, and STEM educators and researchers about reading and writing in STEM. Please submit your abstract in no more than 200 words as a Word document to [email protected]. Abstract will be reviewed until October 31, 2019. We welcome early submissions and will respond within two weeks of submission. The conference welcomes practical contributions supported by a convincing rationale, research presentations and concept-based papers. Presentations will be 30 minutes in length including discussion time. Please also note our “research in process” workshop sessions below.
Suggested conference strands include but are not limited to:
-
The Importance of Reading
-
Developing Academic Literacy
-
Writing for Publication
-
Analyses of STEM Writing (including corpus/genre analyses)
-
Writing for Impact: Grant and Business Writing
-
Interdisciplinary Writing
-
Innovative Practices in Teaching Reading and Writing
-
Graduate Writing in STEM
-
Reading and Writing in General Education
-
STEM Student Writer Panel
-
Science Journalism
Please suggest which strand(s) your paper is best suited for.
For further inquiries about abstract topics, please contact Professor Roger Nunn ([email protected]), Department of Writing Studies, American University of Sharjah.
Special Collaborative Workshop Format
We also propose a special workshop strand on the final afternoon, which focusses on research in process, and is distinguished by its unique approach to sharing research. Instead of the standard model where participants present their finished work in a presentation format, the participants in this workshop-style session collaborate in each other’s projects-in-process by reading a short draft text on fellow participants’ research, and in groups of three or four, ask questions and provide feedback. Each participant discusses and receives thoughtful responses on his/her own work, and reads and provides feedback on three or four other projects. This strand requires pre-reading prior to the conference and could also lead to join publications. For further information on this strand, please contact Dr. Lynne Ronesi ([email protected]) Department of Writing Studies, American University of Sharjah.
Paul Kei Matsuda
Paul Kei Matsuda is Professor of English and Director of Second Language Writing at Arizona State University, where he works closely with doctoral students specializing in second language writing from various disciplinary perspectives. He is also Concurrent Professor of Applied Linguistics at Nanjing University and Zhengzhou University.
Paul is Founding Chair of the Symposium on Second Language Writing and Series Editor of the Parlor Press Series on Second Language Writing. Former President of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, he has also served as the founding chair of the CCCC Committee on Second Language Writing and the chair of the Nonnative English Speakers in TESOL (NNEST) Caucus.
Paul has published widely on various topics on language, writing and professional development in applied linguistics, rhetoric and composition and TESOL, and has received a number of prestigious awards for his publications. He has been invited to present keynote and plenary talks as well as lectures and workshops in various countries and regions, including Australia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, China, Denmark, Germany, Guatemala, Hong Kong, Hungary, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, the Philippines, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, the United States and others.
Paul has previously directed writing programs at the University of New Hampshire and Arizona State University. He has taught a wide variety of courses in applied linguistics, linguistics, rhetoric and composition, and TESOL at Chulalongkorn University (Thailand), Purdue University (USA), Jilin University (China), Kanda University of Foreign Studies (Japan), Miami University (USA), Nagoya University (Japan), Nanjing University (China), Shih Chien University (Taiwan), Tamkang University (Taiwan), Thammasat University (Thailand), the University of New Hampshire (USA) and the University of Utah (USA). In addition, he has held visiting professor and researcher positions at Pennsylvania State University (USA) and the University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong SAR), where he gave lectures and workshops and provided consultations for doctoral students and faculty members.
In addition to teaching, research and professional service, Paul has served as a program developer, evaluator and consultant for various language programs and graduate programs throughout the United States and around the world. Paul’s full bio can be found at https://pmatsuda.faculty.asu.edu/.
John Unger
Poet, sailor and academic, John Unger brings a wealth of real-life experience to his academic work. He specializes in transitional literacy and is the founder of Transitional Literacy.org, which states its mission as “…to support adults transitioning to college, university, or technical schools; the emphasis is on academic and technical English language reading and writing.” This site is an excellent resource for writing and literacy faculty. John worked for many years as an executive associate editor with the Asian EFL Journal and is a founding member of English Scholars Beyond Borders.
He has worked and studied in a wide variety of ESL/EFL and developmental English contexts for almost 30 years. He currently teaches EAP and English Composition courses at Georgia Gwinnet College in Lawrenceville, Georgia, USA. He has published, presented papers and workshops, and taught undergraduate and graduate courses revolving around TESOL, gesture and language, writing, developmental English, linguistics, traditional English grammar and usage, literacy, semiotics and video games, and multilingual/multicultural education. His current research involves the use of digital videos that can be developed as supporting tools for English language learners in K-12, EAP, STEM and transitional literacy-learning contexts.
For the past several years, John has been working with math professor Dr. Andrei Olifer to use digital video for analyzing students’ problem-solving processes for math word problems; he hopes to continue digital video applications for other STEM disciplines. Before his life in higher education, John spent four years in the US Navy and fifteen seasons on coastal and deep-sea commercial fishing boats in the Northern Pacific, Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea.
For a fuller profile, visit: https://www.englishscholarsbeyondborders.org/members-profiles/john-ungers-profile/.
Keynote Presentation:
Analyzing Math Word Problems with Digital Video: The Process and Potential
John Unger and Andrei Olifer
Math word problems, as with many word problems in the STEM disciplines, require students to move from one semiotic system, English for example, to the semiotic system of another STEM discipline, mathematics. This often involves sketching out a visual to depict the problem and translate the words into equations to solve the problem. Just as important as the outcome is the process. Understanding students’ path from the initial reading of the problem to solution is crucial to finding ways to improve this problem-solving process. For this keynote presentation, selected data from several years of collecting different digital video recordings of students solving math word problems will be presented to demonstrate the potential of using digital video to reveal how students are understanding the problem. Along with the data, a theory of language acquisition from Michael Tomasello’s (2003) Usage Based Theory of Language Acquisition is used to present speech, a visual, and the act of pointing as units of analysis that can be adapted to analyze students’ problem-solving processes. The procedures used for the math word problems have previously been used for English language teaching at the sentence, paragraph, and essay level. Moreover, potential applications for other STEM disciplines will be evident, as well as how this overall theoretical framework and procedures can be used to enhance our understanding of metacognition across academic disciplines.
Keynote Presentation:
Informal Writing across the Disciplines: From Competence Testing to Competence Building
Paul Matsuda
Writing instruction for students in STEM fields tends to adopt genre-based approaches, focusing especially on discipline-specific genre features. While genre knowledge is an important part of academic writing proficiency, the tendency is to focus only on the resemblance of form. Even in classrooms that incorporate both genre-based and process-oriented pedagogies, the course design and instructional sequence tends to privilege the form rather than the intellectual process that shapes the text. In this presentation, I will point out the common problems in designing and implementing disciplinary writing pedagogy, and offer various strategies to move from merely testing students’ competence to helping students build their competence. I will also suggest the use of informal writing in facilitating the development of various skills and subskills that are necessary for the successful development of advanced academic literacy.
To download the Abstracts, click here.
Day 1 Morning (10:00 a.m.–1:10 p.m.) Thursday, November 28, 2019
Affiliation |
Philip P. Rodenbough NYU, Abu Dhabi |
Title |
Scientific writing support in a graduate program. |
Abstract
|
NYU Abu Dhabi maintains a robust system of writing support for its graduate students in science and engineering. This presentation will explore some unique features of this specific genre of writing, highlight institutional resources that have been made available, and speculate on how scholars might improve the state of scientific writing pedagogy. |
Affiliation |
Neslihan Bilikozen American University of Sharjah |
Title |
The myth of acquiring academic literacy through academic writing courses only. |
Abstract
|
This paper questions the assumption that university entrants can be fully prepared for the academic literacy demands of the undergraduate curriculum across disciplines through a series of academic literacy courses, often offered during the freshman year. It discusses the overlooked, but essential and complementary, role of subject lecturers in this challenging task. |
Affiliation |
Iga Maria Lehman University of Social Sciences, Warsaw, Poland |
Title |
The dialogicality of authorial voice in the narratives of tertiary-level, L2 students of business. |
Abstract
|
The aim of this paper is to explore how second language (L2), tertiary-level students from business-related disciplines create their authorial voice by constructing and sustaining dialogicality in their academic texts through the activation of the three voice types proposed by Lehman (2018). |
Affiliation |
Silvia Vaccino Indiana University of Pennsylvania (graduate student) |
Title |
Using mobile technology as a vocabulary learning tool. |
Abstract
|
The session examines the effectiveness of mobile technology to foster vocabulary learning and retention in the classroom. The presentation surveys scholarship on the use of mobile-assisted language learning and presents strategies for its inclusion in the EFL classroom |
Affiliation |
Anoud Abusalim American University of Sharjah |
Title |
Modern family or game of thrones: A systematic analysis of second language writing. |
Abstract
|
To contribute to the emerging SLW disciplinarity conversation, bibliometrics analysis of research SLW articles in Web of Science from 2002-2017 is provided in this presentation. Its notable findings emphasize the teaching-driven research in the "transdisciplinary" SLW with 43.7% of its research focusing on pedagogical issues across different units (Matsuda, 2013). |
Affiliation |
Kara Louise Jones American University of Sharjah |
Title |
A scholarly communications model in crisis. |
Abstract
|
The scholarly communications system is in crisis and in need of urgent reform. What does this mean for researchers and authors of scholarly works in STEM and wider fields? This presentation argues that maintaining an understanding of the scholarly communications landscape is crucial to its evolution and support for a sustainable and effective component of the research lifecycle. |
Affiliation |
Hanan Shaher Almarashdi United Arab Emirates University |
Title |
Exploring the mathematics gifted students’ experiences through the confluence of STEM project-based learning: A phenomenological study. |
Abstract
|
This paper aims to explore the mathematics gifted students’ experiences through STEM Project-Based Learning. STEM is a learning approach that is expected to provide gifted students in mathematics with opportunities to experience greater challenges. Findings from this study are expected to serve the larger goal of informing the education of gifted students. |
Affiliation |
Noor ul Ain PORTAL Consultants, Pakistan |
Title |
Establishing professional reading circles (PRCs). |
Abstract
|
This presentation will focus on the practical steps involved in establishing a PRC in an educational institution, its advantages and challenges. It will be based on my on-going research (case study). The Pilot Cycle of the PRC, which was carefully monitored, has already taken place at a private school in Lahore. |
Day 1 Afternoon (2:20 p.m.–4:50 p.m.) Thursday, November 28, 2019
Affiliation |
Fatima Bailey and Areej ElSayary Zayed University |
|
Title |
Reflective writing for promoting STEM competencies of preservice teachers. |
|
Abstract
|
Enabling learners to acquire STEM competencies needed to be successful citizens is one of the main drivers of the Science, Technology and Innovation Policy (2015) in the UAE. In order to enable student learners, teachers must be enabled. This presentation explores how reflective writing can promote STEM competencies for preservice teachers preparing to enter 21st century classrooms. |
Affiliation |
Tharwat El Sakran American University of Sharjah |
Title |
Using data mining SEMMA steps in teaching academic writing skills. |
Abstract
|
This presentation proposes adopting the data mining sequential steps of Sample, Explore, Modify, Model and Assess (SEMMA) in the analysis of research articles published in academic journals in students’ respective academic fields. I will argue that this approach creates awareness of the generic structure of the texts read and has positive effects on students’ writing. |
Affiliation |
Vijay Singh Thakur Dhofar University, Oman |
Title |
Developing an independent mind: Building bridges between independent thinking and writing. |
Abstract
|
As the scientific disciplines are discovery-oriented, students’ success in STEM education primarily depends on independent thinking. This presentation focuses on (a) the primacy of independent mind and thinking skills, (b) the need to teach language in a contextualized, integrated, interactive framework, and (c) how to design and deploy reflection-oriented activities, based on authentic materials, to promote reflective writing skills. |
Affiliation |
Maher Bahloul American University of Sharjah |
Title |
Assessing graduating students’ writing performance. |
Abstract
|
Dr. Maher Bahloul will share concordance results of a writing performance investigation of students after finishing four years of college. More than 350 students were involved in generating a learner corpus of more than 25,000 words. The scores were way below institutional expectations. |
Affiliation |
Sarah Hopkyns and Timothy Nicoll Zayed University |
Title |
Transforming essay writing through app-smashing. |
Abstract
|
This presentation will introduce an app-smashing workflow (combination of apps and websites) for academic essay planning and writing. These comprise: Random.org, Popplet, Adobe Spark, Schoology, and Google Docs. Audience members will learn the steps of the workflow and hear positive feedback from students who have used it. |
Affiliation |
Stephanie Schmidt Alfaisal University, Saudi Arabia |
Title |
Using topic-comment analysis to help students understand academic texts. |
Abstract
|
In this workshop, participants will receive a brief overview of the meaning and use of Topic and Comment in applied linguistics. Then, participants will engage in Topic and Comment analysis of texts. Finally, suggestions for classroom activities will be both presented and elicited from the participants. |
Affiliation |
Nafisa Baba-Ahmed Lancaster University, UK |
Title |
Unlearning to learn or learning to unlearn? Teaching critical thinking in EAP. |
Abstract
|
This presentation aims to explore the concept of “unlearning to learn” specifically using Bloom’s framework to present practical strategies for teaching of both critical-thinking and critical reading and writing simultaneously. |
Day 2 Morning (10:45 a.m.–11:55 p.m.) Friday November 29, 2019
Affiliation |
Philip M. McCarthy American University of Sharjah |
||
Title |
Introducing auto-peer: A computational tool designed to provide automated feedback. |
||
Abstract
|
Auto-Peer is an on-demand computational peer-review tool. The app provides a wide range of feedback, requiring students to either 1) modify their text and/or 2) justify their writing choices. Auto-Peer guides students towards improved writing, allows instructors insight into student misconceptions, and provides researchers with opportunities to better understand student writing. |
Affiliation |
Amani Alsharief King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia |
Title |
The unseen bond between literature and STEM. |
Abstract
|
STEM is a prestigious educational technique that improves students’ cognitive and problem-solving skills. Though STEM appears scientific, it’s influenced by literature. From wireless devices, space travel and DNA cloning to geography and other sciences, literary authors have always inspired scientists. Therefore, incorporating literature with STEM helps the students become innovative. |
Affiliation |
Christopher Horger American University of Sharjah |
Title |
Enhancing literacy with student models. |
Abstract
|
This presentation will discuss the advantages of using student essays as a pedagogical tool to provide readings with more accessible language, to demonstrate specific rhetorical strategies, to offer a more transparent glimpse into the writing process, and to empower students by seeing their peers’ published writing discussed seriously in the classroom. |
Affiliation |
Louise Greenwood Zayed University |
Title |
Using graphic organizers to enhance academic reading and writing skills. |
Abstract
|
Graphic organizers are a practical and visual way to help students understand the discourse patterns of academic texts and enable them to extract essential knowledge. Graphic organizers can also be used to guide students’ writing. This presentation will give an overview of research and share graphic organizers for classroom use. |
Affiliation |
Anuja M. Thomas American University of Sharjah |
Title |
This is the end: Identifying, categorizing, and teaching the final remarks of paragraphs. |
Abstract
|
Research on paragraph ending sentences has been extremely limited. In this study, we analyzed a corpus of student papers, with our analysis suggesting that paragraph endings can be categorized along three dimensions: Action, Function, and Cue. In our talk, we discuss the pedagogical and computational importance of our findings.
|
Day 2 Afternoon (1:10 p.m.– 5:00 p.m.) Friday November 29, 2019
Affiliation |
Raja Bahloul American University of Sharjah |
Title |
Enhancing writing skills through self-reflections and writing portfolios. |
Abstract
|
This study seeks to investigate the role of portfolios in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writers’ metacognition as well as their writing skill. The findings revealed that portfolios can be used not only as assessment tools, but also as indirect means of introducing self-reflection into writing courses. |
Affiliation |
Fauzia Janjua International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan |
Title |
Systems of appraisal and critical reading. |
Abstract
|
Critical reading implies teaching the students the way to think while reading. Lack of critical reading tends to a shallow ascription of text. My presentation outlines an engaging appraisal framework to develop the teaching of reading comprehension skills of English readers. These findings are the result of my teaching of SFL at the International Islamic University in Pakistan. |
Affiliation |
Rachel Buck American University of Sharjah |
Title |
Reading with a purpose: Engineering students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. |
Abstract
|
The presenter discusses the beginnings of a research project at AUS using a survey about metacognitive reading strategies in order to explore how engineering students’ reading strategies change while reading engineering texts. |
Affiliation |
Christopher Weagle American University of Sharjah |
||
Title |
Authentic professional learning through interdisciplinary situated learning communities. |
||
Abstract
|
Information Literacy (IL) scholarship tends to be the domain of library science, whereas the agency of its application is often shared through IL librarian-led workshops and interdepartmental collaboration. However, professional collaboration often ends there. Recent research shows that IL situated-learning environments that prioritize ongoing collaboration across disciplines can enhance the quality of IL instruction while strengthening authentic learning and professional development. |
Affiliation |
Mubina Talaat Women University, Multan, Pakistan |
Title |
The importance of writing for ESL learners. |
Abstract
|
My presentation is about writing difficulties of research students who need to produce ideas and thought as well as facts and findings according to set norms and standards. It is based on my teaching and tutoring experience at different institutions in Pakistan including the Quaid-I- Azam University, Islamabad. I am currently teaching at the Women University, Multan. |
Affiliation |
John R. Baker National Quemoy University, Taiwan |
Title |
Going beyond readability formula: How do titles contribute to the readability of writing center self-access materials? |
Abstract
|
Readability formulae (e.g., the Lexile formula) are often utilized when selecting texts for writing center self-access library shelves. However, formulae only measure two of the many features that contribute to readability. To address this, this presentation reports the results of a sequential mixed-methods study that explored the impact of titles on readability. |
Affiliation |
Naveed Ahmed Khan and Ruqaiyyah Siddiqui American University of Sharjah |
Title |
The art of scientific writing. |
Abstract
|
The aim of this presentation is to provide recommendations and guidelines to assist authors in the field of life sciences to more proficiently publish their work in peer-reviewed journals. The presentation includes a synopsis of basic scientific writing principles, guidelines for the various sections of an original research article and practical recommendations for selecting a suitable journal and responding to peer review comments. |
Affiliation |
Ali Alshahrani University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia |
Title |
Tailoring an assessment model to meet academic writing specifications in an EFL context. |
Abstract
|
This paper investigates the impact of implementing Assessment as a learning strategy in an academic writing course for Engineering students and the potential enhancement in students’ writing. Writing samples were collected and assessed. The finding revealed a modest improvement in students writing quality in terms of sentence structure, correct tense and verb choice. |
Affiliation |
Nadir Ali Kolachi University of Fujairah |
Title |
Rationality in writing: A case study approach for business educators. |
Abstract
|
This paper reports on a model that outlines a sequential writing method for business educators. Business educators need to be proactive, reactive and techno-active to adjust to technology and bring rationality to their writing. The model first proposes mini case studies and then moves through short solution-based cases to longer case studies. |
Affiliation |
Huda El Bakhour and Hadeel El Rahal American University of Sharjah |
Title |
The use of Camtasia as an innovative and interactive feedback tool. |
Abstract
|
The presentation will discuss the use of Camtasia as an interactive feedback tool for students enrolled in English academic writing courses. Using Camtasia will not only be presented as a means of integrating technology in academic writing courses but also a means of providing more efficient, clear, transparent, and engaging feedback to students. |
Affiliation |
Peter Davidson Zayed University |
Title |
Maximizing the effectiveness of teachers’ feedback on writing. |
Abstract
|
The efficacy of teachers providing students with feedback on their writing has been a contentious issue in English Language Teaching for some time. The purpose of this talk is to provide participants with guidelines on how best to provide effective written and oral feedback to students. |
Affiliation |
Holi Ibrahim Holi Ali Rustaq College for Education, Oman |
Title |
Tapping into disciplinary writing challenges arising from EMI in engineering classes. |
Abstract
|
This presentation reports the difficulties with in-class disciplinary writing encountered by Omani engineering students in their EMI engineering study in an Omani public college. The study combined both qualitative and interpretative methodologies with an exploratory research design. The presentation will provide insights for EAP/ESP practitioners as well as content teachers. |
Affiliation |
Noor W. Kaddoura American University of Sharjah |
Title |
Hello from the other side: The structure of counterarguments in student argumentative papers. |
Abstract
|
Research suggests that presenting both sides of an argument often enhances persuasiveness. However, students tend to neglect integrating counterarguments into their papers. In this study, we explore the linguistic and structural features of counterarguments. Through identifying these linguistic features, we aim to improve and promote counterargument integration in student papers. We also discuss the computation implications of our findings. |
Affiliation |
Mohammed Al-Alawi Sultan Qaboos University, Oman |
Title |
Linguistic and discourse features in EFL students' compositions: Comparing in-class and online compositions. |
Abstract
|
This study aims at examining complexity, accuracy, and fluency constructs of written discourse generated from essays written online and essays written in-class. The results reveal that some writing features (e.g., words per T-unit, clauses per T-unit, text length, and lexical density) noticeably were better in the compositions written online. |
Affiliation |
Lelania Sperrazza American University of Sharjah |
Title |
“Success” literacy narratives: What they can reveal about writing practices in academic English. |
Abstract
|
This paper explores how three multilingual students at an American-style university in the UAE constructed success literacy narratives in which they struggled with or against established beliefs about successful academic writing. The study suggests that language practices in academic English impact different understandings of what it means to be a successful writer. |
Affiliation |
Sara Elkhier Hamad UAE University |
Title |
Effective STEM education as the path for a better future: Evaluation of a school’s readiness for STEM integration. |
Abstract
|
STEM education has recently received growing attention both as an innovational pedagogical approach and as a public means for economic growth. In spite of this attention, there is still ambiguity about what counts as STEM and how the four disciplines can be integrated. The current study contributes in clarifying teachers’ perceptions about the process of STEM integration while shedding light on the associated current practices in actual classrooms. |
Affiliation |
Hanan Shaher Almarashdi United Arab Emirates University |
Title |
Exploring the mathematics gifted students’ experiences through the confluence of STEM project-based learning: A phenomenological study. |
Abstract
|
This paper aims to explore the mathematics gifted students’ experiences through STEM Project-Based Learning. STEM is a learning approach that is expected to provide gifted students in mathematics with opportunities to experience greater challenges. Findings from this study are expected to serve the larger goal of informing the education of gifted students. |
To download the program, click here.
Day 1 Morning (Thursday, November 28, 2019)
Time |
Activity |
Presenters |
Room |
Session Chair |
8:00 a.m.– 9:30 a.m. |
Registration |
|
LIB |
|
9:30 a.m.–10:00 a.m. |
Opening Session |
Professor Kevin Mitchell, Chancellor of AUS Professor Mahmoud Anabtawi, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences, AUS Professor Roger Nunn, Conference Chair |
LIB 011 |
Roger Nunn |
10:00 a.m.–11:00 a.m. |
Keynote Address 1: Informal writing across the disciplines: From competence testing to competence building. |
Paul Matsuda |
LIB 011 |
Roger Nunn |
11:00 a.m.–11:15 a.m. |
Coffee Break |
|
|
|
|
Concurrent Sessions |
|
|
|
11:20 a.m.–11:50 a.m. |
Scientific writing support in a graduate program. |
Philip P. Rodenbough |
LIB 011 |
Lynne Ronesi |
The myth of acquiring academic literacy through academic writing courses only. |
Neslihan Bilikozen |
LIB 019 |
Neslihan Bilikozen |
|
12:00 p.m.–12:30 p.m. |
The dialogicality of authorial voice in the narratives of tertiary-level, L2 students of business. |
Iga Maria Lehman |
LIB 011 |
Lynne Ronesi |
Using mobile technology as a vocabulary learning tool. |
Silvia Vaccino |
LIB 019 |
Neslihan Bilikozen |
|
Modern family or game of thrones: A systematic analysis of second language writing. |
Anoud Abusalim |
LIB 024 |
Paul Matsuda |
|
12:40 p.m.–1:10 p.m. |
A scholarly communications model in crisis. |
Kara Louise Jones |
LIB 011 |
Lynne Ronesi |
Establishing professional reading circles (PRCs). |
Noor ul Ain |
LIB 024 |
Maria Eleftheriou |
1:15 p.m.– 2:15 p.m.
|
Lunch |
- |
Day 1 Afternoon (Thursday, November 28, 2019)
|
Concurrent Sessions |
|
|
|
2:20 p.m.– 2:50 p.m. |
Reflective writing for promoting STEM competencies of preservice teachers. |
Fatima Bailey and |
LIB 011 |
Brad Curabba |
Using data mining SEMMA steps in teaching academic writing skills. |
Tharwat El Sakran |
LIB 019 |
Rachel Buck |
|
3:00 p.m.–3:30 p.m. |
Developing an independent mind: Building bridges between independent thinking and writing. |
Vijay Singh Thakur |
LIB 011 |
Brad Curabba |
Assessing graduating students’ writing performance. |
Maher Bahloul |
LIB 019 |
Rachel Buck |
|
3:40 p.m.–4:10 p.m. |
Transforming essay writing through app-smashing. |
Sarah Hopkyns and Timothy Nicoll |
LIB 011 |
Brad Curabba |
Using topic-comment analysis to help students understand academic texts. |
Stephanie Schmidt |
LIB 019 |
Rachel Buck |
|
4:20 p.m.–4:50 p.m. |
Unlearning to learn or learning to unlearn? Teaching critical thinking in EAP. |
Nafisa Baba-Ahmed |
LIB 011 |
Brad Curabba |
Day 2 Morning (Friday, November 29, 2019)
Time |
Activity |
Presenters |
Room |
Session Chair |
8:30 a.m.–9:20 a.m. |
Registration |
|
LIB |
|
9:20 a.m.–9:30 a.m. |
Opening Session |
|
LIB 011 |
Roger Nunn |
9:30 a.m.–10:30 a.m. |
Keynote Address 2: Analyzing math word problems with digital video: The process and potential. |
John Unger |
LIB 011 |
Roger Nunn |
10:30 a.m.–10:40 a.m. |
Coffee Break |
|
|
|
|
Concurrent Sessions |
|
|
|
10:45 a.m.–11:15 a.m. |
Introducing auto-peer: A computational tool designed to provide automated feedback. |
Philip M. McCarthy |
LIB 011 |
Laurence Craven |
The unseen bond between literature and STEM. |
Amani Alsharief |
LIB 019 |
Neena Gandhi |
|
11:25 a.m.–11:55 a.m. |
Enhancing literacy with student models. |
Christopher Horger |
LIB 011 |
Laurence Craven |
Using graphic organizers to enhance academic reading and writing skills. |
Louise Greenwood |
LIB 019 |
Neena Gandhi |
|
This is the end: Identifying, categorizing, and teaching the final remarks of paragraphs. |
Anuja M. Thomas |
LIB 024 |
Maria Eleftheriou |
12:00 p.m.–1:00 p.m. |
Lunch |
- |
Day 2 Afternoon (Friday, November 29, 2019)
|
Concurrent Sessions |
|
|
|
1:10 p.m.–1:40 p.m. |
Enhancing writing skills through self-reflections and writing portfolios. |
Raja Bahloul |
LIB 011 |
Anoud Abusalim |
Systems of appraisal and critical reading. |
Fauzia Janjua |
LIB 019 |
Randa Bou Mehdi |
|
Reading with a purpose: Engineering students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. |
Rachel Buck |
LIB 024 |
Aisha Sayidina |
|
1:50 p.m.–2:20 p.m. |
Authentic professional learning through interdisciplinary situated learning communities. |
Christopher Weagle |
LIB 011 |
John Unger |
The importance of writing for ESL learners. |
Mubina Talaat |
LIB 019 |
Randa Bou Mehdi |
|
Going beyond readability formula: How do titles contribute to the readability of writing center self-access materials? |
John Baker |
LIB 024 |
Aisha Sayidina |
|
2:30 p.m.–3:00 p.m. |
The art of scientific writing. |
Naveed Ahmed Khan and Ruqaiyyah Siddiqui |
LIB 011 |
Anoud Abusalim |
Tailoring an assessment model to meet academic writing specifications in an EFL context. |
Ali Alshahrani |
LIB 019 |
Randa Bou Mehdi |
|
Rationality in writing: A case study approach for business educators. |
Nadir Ali Kolachi |
LIB 024 |
Aisha Sayidina |
|
3:10 p.m.–3:40 p.m. |
The use of Camtasia as an innovative and interactive feedback tool. |
Huda Dimashkie and Hadeel El Rahal |
LIB 011 |
Greg VanderPyl |
Maximizing the effectiveness of teachers’ feedback on writing. |
Peter Davidson |
LIB 019 |
Susan Munday |
|
Tapping into disciplinary writing challenges arising from EMI in engineering classes. |
Holi Ibrahim Holi Ali
|
LIB 024 |
Christopher Horger |
|
3:50 p.m.–4:20 p.m. |
Hello from the other side: The structure of counterarguments in student argumentative papers. |
Noor W. Kaddoura |
LIB 011 |
Greg VanderPyl |
Linguistic and discourse features in EFL students' compositions: Comparing in-class and online compositions. |
Mohammed Al-Alawi |
LIB 019 |
Susan Munday |
|
“Success” literacy narratives: What they can reveal about writing practices in academic English. |
Lelania Sperrazza |
LIB 024 |
Christopher Horger |
|
4:30 p.m.–5:00 p.m. |
Effective STEM education as the path for a better future: Evaluation of a school’s readiness for STEM integration. |
Sara Elkhier Hamad |
LIB 011 |
Greg VanderPyl |
Exploring the mathematics gifted students’ experiences through the confluence of STEM project based learning: A phenomenological study. |
Hanan Shaher Almarashdi |
LIB 019 |
Susan Munday |
Please download the form, type in the information, save the form, then send it electronically to [email protected]
Organizing Committee
- Roger Nunn (Chair)
- Lynn Ronesi
- Alaanoud Abusalim
- Tharwat El-Sakran (Department of English)
- Ali Sami Alnaser (Head, Department of Physics)
- Hadeel al Rahal
- Randa Bou Mehdi
- Neslihan Bilikozen
Department of Writing Studies Logistical Support Team
- Ozgur Parlak
- Zsuzanne Munday
- Rachel Buck
- Brad Curabba
- Maria Eleftheriou (and Writing Center Tutors)
College of Engineering Advisor
- Ghaleb Husseini
Abstract Review
- Roger Nunn
- Tharwat El Sakran
- Philip McCarthy
- Lynne Ronesi
- Alaanoud Abusalim
- Ozgur Parlak
- Zsuzanne Munday
- Rachel Buck
- Brad Curabba
Payment Error
Thank You for Registering